True Tester vs. SDET: The Function of Codeless Automation
The practise of developing automated testing without writing
a single line of code is known as codeless automation. There are many codeless
test automation products driven by AI on the market. Automation is the way of
the future in the digital age, yet no matter what technology you use, it will
never be possible to automate everything. By adopting codeless test automation,
the gap between a "SDET" and a "True Tester" can be
narrowed. A SDET Bootcamp can function well as a "True Tester" and codeless
automation requires less work.
SDET
More SDETs (also known as "Software Development
Engineer in Test"), or Java, Python, and C# programmers, make up the
tester generation of today. Their programming abilities are strong, but they
lack testing and quality concepts. Companies are also looking for SDETs who can
create simple programmes. As a result, they skimp on testing expertise and
product quality. They no longer concentrate on the functional notions but
rather exclusively on issues like coding, automation, algorithms, and code
complexity. Due to the fact that the automation code is ineffective and
frequently fails, SDETs lack the fundamental testing competencies such as test
conditions and levels of test coverage.
Real Tester
A genuine tester is someone who can comprehend business
needs, clarify ambiguous requirements, develop E2E scenarios intended to detect
system defects, develop test designs with positive/negative validation, and
discover high-quality bugs. But most significantly, a tester needs to have
end-user or customer perspective. He or she makes sure that the fundamentals of
test design are upheld, that maximum test coverage is obtained, and that strong
domain expertise and E2E SIT (system integration testing) abilities are
provided. A manual or functional tester who can identify the scope that can be
automated is known as a "True Tester."
Ways to close the gap
Future of automation = Manual QA + SDET (Codeless
Automation)
Combining manual and codeless automation to revolutionise QA
testing appears to hold promise in the rapidly evolving IT and digital markets.
Designing and validating manual tests are part of manual quality assurance. The
same person can also perform automation testing because just functional
abilities and domain knowledge are needed; coding knowledge is not. By adopting
the mindset of a manual tester, QA can increase the coverage of automated
tests. minimise the distance between Manual QA & SDET Training Course as a result.
The benefits of
codeless automation
Easy test automation - Simple creation and execution of
automated UI, web, and mobile application scripts from manual test cases. Since
they don't need considerable training for a codeless tool, manual QA may
perform test automation. One person can perform both manual and automated
testing.
·
No object or code maintenance One of the most
difficult aspects of test automation is maintaining the test code that was
created for the automation in any tool that is coded.
·
Automate the proper test in less time - Agile or
project development sometimes involves changing requirements. As it takes less
time to build, saves time, and reduces execution time by running tests in
parallel, testers make the effort to design the proper test in a codeless
automation tool.
·
Inexpensive - Since any team member may automate
processes, no more resources need to be hired. As a result, codeless automated
testing requires fewer resources to manage.
·
It moves 6x more quickly than scripted
automation. Testing with codeless automation is 6 times faster than testing
using code since QA can record and replay E2E and regression test scenarios. QA
must run test cases in a variety of operating systems, devices, and versions
while conducting mobile testing. Tools without code can run the test cases
considerably more quickly than tools with code.
·
Improved Quality: Tools for codeless automation
concentrate on software quality and debugging rather than handling large
amounts of code. Businesses don't cut corners on quality since it produces
greater results.
·
Advanced reporting - Codeless automation
technologies are strong, customizable, and have the ability to provide advanced
reporting, making it simpler for stakeholders to comprehend the test progress
and reports.
Despite the fact that codeless automation has many wonderful
benefits, there are a few myths that give it a "poor rap."
Why choose a
technology for code-free test automation?
·
No need to install complicated software or
libraries because the software is pre-packaged
·
simple cooperation
·
Wrapper for Selenium and Appium powered by AI
·
Saves money and time and requires no maintenance
·
Parallel processing
·
Integrating GitHub
·
Cloud test deployment that is automated
·
Plan your testing to coincide with agile release
cycles
·
Supports mobile apps (Android/IOS) testing,
cross-browser testing, API testing, and web testing
·
Excellent representation of test execution and status
in the report's graphics
·
Execute remotely
·
Support for BDD and sophisticated scripting
capabilities
·
Assistance with data-driven testing
·
Integration with Sauce Labs, Jenkins, and
BrowserStack
·
Supports emulators and lab testing for mobile
devices
·
Appropriate for agile testing
·
Capable of managing a sizable data set and supporting
different data sources
Conclusion
Without wasting time on sophisticated scenario test writing,
a tester can begin test automation as soon as the UI design is complete. This
makes it simple to align continuous integration with the development life
cycle.
A codeless automation tool interacts with bug tracking, test
management, and AI-powered features, is dependable and robust, and operates on
the record-play principle. Additionally, it is affordable, requires no code
maintenance, and supports cloud infrastructure. It's the greatest option for
agile and DevOps release cycles that need to be speedier.
In terms of product quality, codeless automation performs
better than coded automation since it narrows the distance between a
"SDET" and a "True tester" and enables customers to obtain
greater product quality coverage.
Comments
Post a Comment